Quadro CX vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When comparing Quadro CX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro CX

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro CX	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
		Check Price

Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	30−33
medium / 1080p	2−3	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro CX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	200−210
medium / 768p	85−90	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	10−11	24−27
high / 768p	60−65	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	95−100
medium / 1080p	8−9	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	40−45	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	3−4	27−30
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	8−9	50−55
medium / 768p	7−8	30−35
high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
high / 768p	30−33	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	Quadro CX	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GT200B	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	11 November 2008	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	602 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	38.53
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	4.0
OpenGL	3.3
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	1.3
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Quadro CX vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares