Quadro K1000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	30−33
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	95−100
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	N14P-Q1	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2012	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Quadro K1000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares