Quadro K2000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−33
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
90−95
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
QHD / 1440p
21−24
50−55
4K / 2160p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
10−12
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
50−55
medium / 768p
8−9
30−35
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N14P-Q3
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
15 August 2020
Pipelines
384
96
Core clock speed
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
