Quadro K3100M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K3100M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K3100M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K3100M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K3100M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro K3100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−33
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
180−190
200−210
medium / 768p
150−160
170−180
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
QHD / 1440p
45−50
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
24−27
high / 768p
110−120
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
100−105
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
70−75
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 27% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Quadro K3100M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
40−45
50−55
medium / 768p
24−27
30−35
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro K3100M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N15E-Q1-A2
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
23 July 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
768
96
Core clock speed
706 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
45.18
Floating-point performance
1,084 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
