Quadro K420 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K420 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K420 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K420
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
41 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
128 Bit
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB/2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K420 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro K420 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro K420 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
9−10
30−33
medium / 1080p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
1−2
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
9−10
45−50
medium / 1080p
2−3
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K420 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
200−210
medium / 768p
75−80
170−180
ultra / 1080p
30−35
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
9−10
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
35−40
90−95
ultra / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
95−100
medium / 1080p
4−5
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
50−55
medium / 1080p
3−4
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
35−40
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
1−2
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
50−55
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
4−5
50−55
medium / 768p
−
30−35
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
high / 768p
27−30
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro K420.
Full Specs
Quadro K420
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GK107
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
22 July 2014
15 August 2020
Pipelines
192
96
Core clock speed
876 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
14.02
Floating-point performance
336.4 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
11 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
