Quadro M2000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Quadro M2000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
128 Bit
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro M2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
6−7
1−2
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−33
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
QHD / 1440p
12−14
1−2
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M2000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
200−210
medium / 768p
200−210
170−180
ultra / 1080p
120−130
90−95
QHD / 1440p
90−95
50−55
4K / 2160p
50−55
24−27
high / 768p
170−180
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
120−130
95−100
medium / 1080p
70−75
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
QHD / 1440p
14−16
6−7
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
95−100
70−75
high / 1080p
40−45
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−11
6−7
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 43% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
75−80
50−55
medium / 768p
45−50
30−35
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GM206
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
8 April 2016
15 August 2020
Pipelines
768
96
Core clock speed
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
