Quadro M600M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Quadro M600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M600M will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M600M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro M600M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro M600M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−33
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
170−180
200−210
medium / 768p
140−150
170−180
ultra / 1080p
75−80
90−95
QHD / 1440p
40−45
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
24−27
high / 768p
110−120
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
75−80
95−100
medium / 1080p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 27% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
65−70
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
70−75
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−105
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Quadro M600M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
35−40
50−55
medium / 768p
24−27
30−35
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Quadro M600M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro M600M.
Full Specs
Quadro M600M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
15 August 2020
Pipelines
384
96
Core clock speed
837 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
14.02
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
