Radeon E8860 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon E8860 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon E8860 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon E8860 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon E8860 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Radeon E8860 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Venus | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 25 January 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon E8860 vs Quadro K2000
- Radeon E8860 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K2000
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Radeon E8860 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon E8860 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100