Radeon HD 4810 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 4810 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 4810 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 920M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 920M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100