Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When comparing Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | R700 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 November 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 840A
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100