Radeon Pro 5600M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5600M will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 5600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro 5600M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5600M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
HBM2
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 5600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon Pro 5600M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
50−55
12−14
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
1−2
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
30−33
medium / 1080p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 257% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
75−80
21−24
ultra / 1080p
70−75
18−20
QHD / 1440p
50−55
1−2
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
130−140
45−50
medium / 1080p
85−90
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Battlefield 5 is 269% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 5600M.
low / 768p
250−260
200−210
medium / 768p
230−240
170−180
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
QHD / 1440p
150−160
50−55
4K / 2160p
100−110
24−27
high / 768p
220−230
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
60−65
14−16
QHD / 1440p
40−45
−
4K / 2160p
21−24
5−6
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
65−70
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Far Cry 5 is 255% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
90−95
21−24
ultra / 1080p
70−75
18−20
QHD / 1440p
45−50
12−14
4K / 2160p
21−24
−
low / 720p
220−230
95−100
medium / 1080p
140−150
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Fortnite is 190% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
85−90
24−27
ultra / 1080p
65−70
18−20
QHD / 1440p
45−50
6−7
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
low / 720p
130−140
50−55
medium / 1080p
90−95
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
160−170
80−85
medium / 768p
150−160
70−75
high / 1080p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
40−45
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
35−40
8−9
ultra / 1080p
30−35
6−7
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
0−1
low / 720p
90−95
27−30
medium / 1080p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Metro Exodus is 278% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
75−80
−
ultra / 1080p
55−60
14−16
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
120−130
55−60
medium / 1080p
85−90
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
35−40
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−12
−
low / 720p
90−95
27−30
medium / 1080p
55−60
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
180−190
50−55
medium / 768p
120−130
30−35
high / 1080p
70−75
16−18
ultra / 1080p
40−45
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 291% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
30−35
high / 768p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Navi / RDNA
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Navi 10
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
15 June 2020
15 August 2020
Pipelines
2560
96
Boost Clock
1265 MHz
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
164.8
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
Memory clock speed
1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth
394.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
