Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
30−33
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
140−150
200−210
medium / 768p
110−120
170−180
ultra / 1080p
55−60
90−95
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
24−27
high / 768p
85−90
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
24−27
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 54% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
27−30
50−55
medium / 768p
18−20
30−35
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Polaris
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Polaris 12
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
21 March 2018
15 August 2020
Pipelines
512
96
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
