Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R5 430 OEM stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 166% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Oland | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 June 2016 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K2000M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100