Radeon R7 A265 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between Radeon R7 A265 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A265 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon R7 A265

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 A265	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Radeon R7 A265 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon R7 A265 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Radeon R7 A265 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	200−210
medium / 768p	85−90	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	10−11	24−27
high / 768p	60−65	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	95−100
medium / 1080p	8−9	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	40−45	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	3−4	27−30
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	8−9	50−55
medium / 768p	7−8	30−35
high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
high / 768p	30−33	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 A265	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Opal	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2014	15 August 2020
Pipelines	384	96
Core clock speed	725 MHz
Boost Clock	825 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	19.80
Floating-point performance	633.6 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Radeon R7 A265 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares