Radeon R7 A360 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon R7 A360 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A360 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 A360 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A360 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R7 A360 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon R7 A360 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 A360 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Meso | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 720A
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100