Radeon R9 A375 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon R9 A375 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 A375 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 A375 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R9 A375 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Venus | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100