Tesla C2050 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Tesla C2050 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Tesla C2050 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.

Tesla C2050

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Tesla C2050	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI
		Check Price

Tesla C2050 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−33
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	8−9	1−2
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	60−65	45−50
medium / 1080p	30−35	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	220−230	200−210
medium / 768p	190−200	170−180
ultra / 1080p	110−120	90−95
QHD / 1440p	70−75	50−55
4K / 2160p	35−40	24−27
high / 768p	150−160	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	20−22	14−16
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	110−120	95−100
medium / 1080p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	10−12	6−7
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	85−90	70−75
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	5−6	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	10−12	8−9
ultra / 1080p	9−10	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	40−45	30−35
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	Tesla C2050	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Fermi	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GF100	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011	15 August 2020
Pipelines	448	96
Core clock speed	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops
Length	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	90 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Tesla C2050 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares