Tesla M2070 Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between Tesla M2070 Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Tesla M2070 Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Tesla M2070 Q
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Tesla M2070 Q is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Tesla M2070 Q is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 155% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GF100 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100