Quadro P5000 mobile vs TITAN V
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
TITAN V
Quadro P5000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P5000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P5000 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P5000 mobile | TITAN V | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- TITAN V has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro P5000 mobile.
- Quadro P5000 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and TITAN V uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro P5000 mobile has 4 GB more memory, than TITAN V.
- Quadro P5000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and TITAN V - in Desktops.
- Quadro P5000 mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and TITAN V - with Volta.
- Core clock speed of TITAN V is 36 MHz higher, than Quadro P5000 mobile.
- Quadro P5000 mobile is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and TITAN V - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5000 mobile is 4310 MHz higher, than TITAN V.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 34% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 230−240 | 260−270 |
| medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Fortnite is 29% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro P5000 mobile and TITAN V have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 290−300 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 49% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 300−350 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of TITAN V in World of Tanks is 122% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P5000 mobile | TITAN V | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Volta |
| Code name | N17E-Q5 | GV100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2017 | 7 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 5120 |
| Core clock speed | 1164 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1506 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 21,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 202.5 | 465.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops | 14,899 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6006 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 651.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 1.45 kh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 884 Sol/s | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Siacoin / SC (Sia) | 3.44 Gh/s | |
| Check Price |