Quadro P4200 vs Titan X Pascal
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro P4200 stacks up against Titan X Pascal, check out specs charts below.
Titan X Pascal
Quadro P4200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P4200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P4200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P4200 | Titan X Pascal | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Titan X Pascal has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P4200.
- Quadro P4200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Titan X Pascal - in Desktops.
- Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal are build with Pascal architecture.
- Core clock speed of Titan X Pascal is 203 MHz higher, than Quadro P4200.
- Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal are manufactured by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Titan X Pascal is 2868 MHz higher, than Quadro P4200.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| low / 720p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Forza Horizon 4 is 4% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Metro Exodus is 5% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro P4200 and Titan X Pascal have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Titan X Pascal in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro P4200. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P4200 | Titan X Pascal | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP102 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 May 2018 | 25 July 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1418 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 | |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7132 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.98 kh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |