FirePro S7150 vs UHD Graphics 615
When comparing FirePro S7150 and UHD Graphics 615, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and UHD Graphics 615 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 900% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 620 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and UHD Graphics 615 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 222% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7150 and UHD Graphics 615 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 571% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 390% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 5−6 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than UHD Graphics 615. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 30 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 25.20 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |