FireStream 9250 vs UHD Graphics 615
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and UHD Graphics 615 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 615 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 35% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |