FireStream 9270 vs UHD Graphics 615
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and UHD Graphics 615, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and UHD Graphics 615.
FireStream 9270
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 46% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |