Radeon HD 4810 vs UHD Graphics 615
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4810 and UHD Graphics 615 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4810 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 615 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and UHD Graphics 615 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and UHD Graphics 615 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in World of Tanks is 84% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |