Quadro 2000 vs UHD Graphics 617
In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and UHD Graphics 617 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 617 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
UHD Graphics 617 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 617 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 617 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000
UHD Graphics 617
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000 has 313% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 617.
Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 617 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Quadro 2000 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 617 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 617 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 325 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 617.
Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 617 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
9−10
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 617.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
high / 768p
60−65
75−80
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
Quadro 2000 and UHD Graphics 617 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
3−4
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−11
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
40−45
50−55
high / 1080p
3−4
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
1−2
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
3−4
8−9
medium / 1080p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
30−33
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
8−9
18−20
medium / 768p
7−8
12−14
high / 1080p
3−4
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 617 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro 2000.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000
UHD Graphics 617
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9 Amber Lake
Code name
GF106
Kaby-Lake GT2
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 December 2010
30 October 2018
Pipelines
192
24
Core clock speed
625 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
20.00
25.20
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
Length
178 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
