Tesla C2050 vs UHD Graphics 617
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 617. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 617. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
UHD Graphics 617 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 617 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 617 here:
Main Specs
| Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 617 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 617.
- Tesla C2050 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 617 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Tesla C2050 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 617 - in Laptops.
- Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 617 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 617.
- Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 617 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 140% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 617 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | GF100 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 30 October 2018 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |