FirePro S9000 vs UHD Graphics 620
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and UHD Graphics 620, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and UHD Graphics 620.
FirePro S9000
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2233% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 26 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 600 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than UHD Graphics 620. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Tahiti | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |