GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics 620
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics 620. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics 620. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1760 GB more memory, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 6% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | GT200B | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |