GeForce GTX 460 SE vs UHD Graphics 620
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and UHD Graphics 620. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and UHD Graphics 620. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 900% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1000 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 25% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 70% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 9% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 43% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | GF104 | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |