GRID M6 8Q vs UHD Graphics 620
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and UHD Graphics 620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and UHD Graphics 620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 24 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 422 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 67% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | GM204 | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |