Quadro 2000M vs UHD Graphics 620
When comparing Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 2000M and UHD Graphics 620 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
UHD Graphics 620
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
5−6
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Minecraft is 50% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
low / 768p
0−1
12−14
medium / 768p
−
9−10
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
UHD Graphics 620
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5
Code name
Fermi
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
22 February 2011
1 September 2017
Pipelines
192
24
Core clock speed
550 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
27.60
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
