Quadro 3000M vs UHD Graphics 620
When comparing Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
UHD Graphics 620
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 150 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
6−7
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
medium / 768p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
21−24
21−24
4K / 2160p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
4−5
5−6
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
60−65
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 6% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p
10−11
12−14
medium / 768p
8−9
9−10
high / 1080p
4−5
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
Quadro 3000M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
UHD Graphics 620
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5
Code name
Fermi
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
22 February 2011
1 September 2017
Pipelines
240
24
Core clock speed
450 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
27.60
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
