Quadro K1000M vs UHD Graphics 620
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and UHD Graphics 620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M and UHD Graphics 620 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and UHD Graphics 620 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
UHD Graphics 620
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
5−6
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Minecraft is 50% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
low / 768p
0−1
12−14
medium / 768p
−
9−10
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
UHD Graphics 620
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5
Code name
N14P-Q1
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
1 September 2017
Pipelines
192
24
Core clock speed
850 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
27.60
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
