Quadro K2200M vs UHD Graphics 620
When comparing Quadro K2200M and UHD Graphics 620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and UHD Graphics 620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 30% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 70% more, than UHD Graphics 620. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |