Radeon R7 A360 vs UHD Graphics 620
In this comparison between Radeon R7 A360 and UHD Graphics 620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A360 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon R7 A360 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Minecraft is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | Meso | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |