FirePro M4000 vs UHD Graphics 630
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and UHD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
UHD Graphics 630
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4000 has 120% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 300 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 34% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 1 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 26.45 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |