GRID K520 vs UHD Graphics 630

In this comparison between GRID K520 and UHD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K520

UHD Graphics 630

Main Specs

	GRID K520	UHD Graphics 630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	20−22	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K520 and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	45−50
QHD / 1440p	55−60	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−35	−
high / 768p	140−150	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	95−100	55−60
ultra / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	18−20	3−4
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	27−30	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	55−60	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	27−30	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	20−22
medium / 1080p	30−35	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	60−65	16−18
medium / 768p	35−40	12−14
high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than UHD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	UHD Graphics 630
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5
Code name	GK104	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	1 October 2017
Pipelines	1536	24
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.45
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	460.8 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+

GRID K520 vs UHD Graphics 630

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares