Quadro FX 3800 vs UHD Graphics 630
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and UHD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
UHD Graphics 630
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 300 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
Quadro FX 3800 and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Fortnite is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | GT200B | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |