Quadro M3000M vs UHD Graphics 630
In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and UHD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
UHD Graphics 630
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 750 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 357% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | GM204 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |