Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs UHD Graphics 630
When comparing Radeon Pro Vega 16 and UHD Graphics 630, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and UHD Graphics 630 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
UHD Graphics 630
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | HBM2 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 and UHD Graphics 630 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 370% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | − |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 533% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 221% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 221% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 625% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Vega | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Vega Mobile | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 15 November 2018 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Laptop size | large | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon HD 7870
- UHD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 7870
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs FirePro W4190M
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
- UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro W4190M
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge