Radeon R7 M270 vs UHD Graphics 630
When choosing between Radeon R7 M270 and UHD Graphics 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 M270 and UHD Graphics 630.
UHD Graphics 630
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | Not Listed | System Shared |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 525 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | Opal XT / Mars | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2014 | 1 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 26.45 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |