Radeon R9 M295X vs UHD Graphics 630
When choosing between Radeon R9 M295X and UHD Graphics 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M295X and UHD Graphics 630.
UHD Graphics 630
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M295X | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | Not Listed | System Shared |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 1566% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Radeon R9 M295X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Radeon R9 M295X is used in Laptops, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M295X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 423 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 112% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 357% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 55% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M295X | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Tonga | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 October 2014 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | Not Listed | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro S9000
- UHD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro S9000
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro W4190M
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
- UHD Graphics 630 vs FirePro W4190M
- UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge