FireStream 9370 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 59% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- FireStream 9370 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640