GeForce 820A vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 820A and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 820A stacks up against UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 820A
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 475 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF117 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro 500M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 7730M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce 820A vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640