GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640