Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
130−140
medium / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
50−55
QHD / 1440p
35−40
27−30
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
10−12
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 5% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
30−35
24−27
medium / 768p
21−24
16−18
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
28 May 2019
Pipelines
40
32
Core clock speed
200 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
