Radeon R7 A265 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
In this comparison between Radeon R7 A265 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A265 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 A265 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 A265 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 425 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 A265 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Opal | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 January 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640