Tesla C2050 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 111% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 21% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. |
Full Specs
Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF100 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 25 July 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 448 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640