Tesla M2070 Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Tesla M2070 Q is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Tesla M2070 Q is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF100 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 25 July 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 448 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 8790M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640