Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
System Shared
DDR4
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 100 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
6−7
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
6−7
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Fortnite is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−12
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
9−10
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
80−85
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
75−80
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
9−10
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
16−18
18−20
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
7−8
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Lakefield GT2
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 June 2015
28 May 2020
Pipelines
48
64
Core clock speed
300 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
500 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
